Government Internet Shutdowns Cost Over $9 Billion in 2023

  • Our annual report analyzes every major intentional internet shutdown in 2023 and reveals that they cost the world economy $9.13 billion.
  • 2022: 114 internet shutdowns in 23 countries lasting 50,095 hours cost $24.61 billion. Russia was the most affected nation with a cost of $21.59 billion,
  • 2021: 50 internet shutdowns in 21 countries lasting 30,179 hours cost $5.45 billion. Myanmar inflicted the worst economic damage on itself via internet outages ($2.8 billion).
  • 2020: 93 internet shutdowns in 21 countries lasting 27,165 hours cost $4.01 billion. India imposed the most costly internet outages overall ($2.8 billion).
  • 2019: 134 internet shutdowns in 22 countries lasting 19,207 hours cost $8.07 billion. Iraq’s internet outages were most costly ($2.3 billion).

 

Internet Shutdowns 2023: Cost by Country

The following data table shows all countries that have experienced a major internet shutdown in 2023. The table is ordered from greatest to least economic impact, measured in USD.

The data table also indicates the nature of any additional human rights abuses perpetrated during each internet shutdown. A cross indicates that the human right specified was violated during the period around the internet outage.

Rank Country Total Cost Duration (Hrs) Internet Users Affected Peaceful Protest Free & Fair Elections Press Freedom
1 Russia $4.02 billion 1,353 113 million
2 Ethiopia $1.59 billion 14,910 29.8 million
3 Myanmar $974 million 18,768 23.7 million
4 Iran $920.3 million 13,140 33.7 million
5 India $585.4 million 7,956 59.1 million
6 Iraq $328.5 million 465 20.6 million
7 Pakistan $237.6 million 259 82.9 million
8 Algeria $101.9 million 50 32.1 million
9 Senegal $57.5 million 3,946 8.01 million
10 Azerbaijan $52.3 million 3,495 8.6 million
11 Guinea $47.4 million 3,720 4.9 million
12 Brazil $46.2 million 48 174.2 million
13 Mauritania $38.5 million 482 1.7 million
14 Yemen $37.2 million 2,376 8.8 million
15 Venezuela $33.6 million 2 17.4 million
16 Kenya $27 million 192 15.6 million
17 Sudan $12.4 million 212 4.8 million
18 Syria $9.6 million 34 8.1 million
19 Turkey $5.8 million 12 70 million
20 Gabon $5.4 million 87 1.5 million
21 Tanzania $2.8 million 7,680 14 million
22 Cuba $1.7 million 2 8 million
23 Chad $0.8 million 14 1.8 million
24 Zimbabwe $0.5 million 24 4.4 million
25 Suriname $0.1 million 12 0.4 million

For data on individual internet shutdowns, see the Cost of Internet Shutdowns Tracker Data Sheet.

For more information on the circumstances of each country’s shutdowns, jump to the Internet Shutdowns Background 2023 section of this report.

Internet Shutdowns 2023: Cost by Region

The following data table shows the total economic cost of all major internet shutdowns in 2023 broken down by the global region where the disruptions occurred. The data table is ordered from greatest to least economic impact, measured in USD. Russia is included under Europe.

Region Total Cost Duration (Hrs) Internet Users Affected
Europe $4.02 billion 1,365 182.95 million
Asia $1.85 billion 30,478 180.1 million
Sub-Saharan Africa $1.74 billion 30,785 84.8 million
MENA $1.44 billion 16,547 105.04 million
South America $79.9 million 62 192.04 million
North America $1.7 million 2 7.99 million

The bar chart below shows the economic impact of all major internet shutdowns in 2023 on each of the global regions where the disruptions occurred, broken down by context, i.e. the reason why the internet outage was implemented. Note that Russia is included under Europe.

Bar chart showing the most expensive reasons for internet shutdowns in 2023 across different regions

Bar chart showing the most expensive reasons for internet shutdowns in 2023 by global region.

Most Blocked Social Media Platforms in 2023

The following data table shows the length of time each social media platform was blocked in 2023. The data table is ordered from greatest to least number of hours. Note the total number of hours exceeds the total duration of social media shutdowns as multiple platforms are typically blocked in each outage.

The data table also indicates the number of incidents involving each social media platform.

Social Media Platform No. of Shutdowns Duration (Hrs)
X (Twitter) 16 10,683
Instagram 17 9,063
TikTok 3 8,496
Clubhouse 1 7,680
WhatsApp 14 7,679
Facebook 19 6,747
Youtube 16 5,286
Telegram 5 5,208
Signal 1 2,352
Zoom 1 24

The following chart shows the split of social media shutdowns in 2023 by the total duration of incidents involving each social media platform.

Donut chart showing which social media platforms were blocked for the longest time in 2023

Donut chart showing which social media platforms were blocked for the longest time in 2023

Internet Shutdowns 2023: Cost by Context

The following data table shows the total economic cost of all major internet shutdowns in 2023 grouped by context, i.e. the nature of what prompted local authorities to cut internet access. The data table is ordered from greatest to least economic impact, measured in USD.

The data table also indicates the number of incidents in each category and the total duration of deliberate internet outages in hours.

Context Total Cost No. of Shutdowns Duration (Hrs)
Conflict $5.19 billion 18 20,462
Protests $2.8 billion 58 29,033
Exams $464.1 million 83 582
Information control $421 million 33 20,289
Military coup $219 million 2 8,847
Election Interference $34.1 million 2 26

The following chart shows split of the economic cost of all major government internet outages in 2023 by context, i.e. the nature of what prompted local authorities to cut internet access.

Donut chart showing which reasons for internet shutdowns had the most economic impact in 2023

Donut chart showing the reasons for internet shutdowns in 2023 with the most economic impact

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following chart shows the split of reasons for all major government internet outages in 2023 by frequency.

Donut chart showing the most common reasons for internet shutdowns in 2023

Donut chart showing the most common reasons for internet shutdowns in 2023

How Do Governments Shut Down The Internet?

Government internet outages typically take the form of total internet blackouts or social media blocks. Another censorship tactic is internet throttling, where internet speeds are restricted so severely that anything beyond simple text-based communication becomes impossible, such as live-streaming video of protests or human rights abuses.

Internet Service Providers (ISPs) use a number of methods to implement restrictions following government orders to do so. Some of the most common are below.

Network Shutdown

The most crude method of blocking access to the internet is when governments force ISPs and mobile carriers to literally power down critical circuits that make up the country’s telecommunications network.

Governments that have complete control over their country’s network may also install an “internet kill-switch”. The UN has condemned the use of such single shut-off mechanisms.

Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Manipulation

BGP is the protocol that manages the global routing system of the internet, which allows packets of data to travel from their source to their destination. It works via requiring every network node (known as an Autonomous System or AS) making up the global internet to constantly advertise which IP addresses it gives access to.

These announcements flash back and forth across the whole network, marking the route between any two points on that network, each of which is a cluster of IP addresses. This protocol is what makes it possible to access a website or app hosted in another location.

By manipulating the contents of these announcements, or BGP routing tables, an ISP can make the Internet Protocol (IP) addresses of any number of its customers “disappear” from the internet, effectively cutting off access for those people. This is more precise than a full network shutdown and allows for exceptions to be made, such as for government officials.

IP Address Blocking

Websites and apps rely on web servers to host their content, each of which has its own IP address. This unique numerical address allows devices to find and communicate with each other.

ISPs can create lists of IP addresses that correspond with services they want to block and then block all internet traffic to or from those IP addresses.

As multiple websites and services can be hosted on a single IP address, this method of internet censorship often leads to unintentionally blocking more than was intended.

Domain Name System (DNS) Filtering

DNS filtering works in a similar way to IP blocking but is more precise as it targets the domain name rather than an IP address.

Information associated with domain names, such as top10vpn.com, are stored in a database distributed across multiple DNS Servers. Browsers rely on intermediate services, called DNS resolvers, to perform DNS lookups for specific domains against these databases, and retrieve the relevant destination IP address of the server, which then lets the browser communicate with the server that holds the desired URL.

ISPs can program these DNS resolvers to return incorrect information for particular DNS lookups, such as twitter.com not existing. When this happens, users are met with an error page instead of the website or app loading as normal.

Deep Packet Inspection (DPI)

DPI examines the full contents of the data packets making up internet traffic on a network to allow for blocking of specific content or applications. DPI relies on devices between the end user and the rest of the internet, known as middleboxes and which form a key role in internet censorship in places like China. Manufacturers include companies like Huawei and Allot.

DPI is also very effective at throttling speeds for specific types of traffic, such as video or Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP).

As a result, VPNs that actually work in China have to use technology like traffic obfuscation to bypass DPI.

Protocol Blocking

Targeting specific protocols, such as TCP/IP port number is another method for blocking or throttling certain apps associated with known TCP/IP ports.

Governments can use this method to target instant messaging services or email for example to prevent citizens from communicating.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *